Design 13: Classical Natural Language Processing
Sunday, May 17, 2026
Theme
I wanted this puzzle to focus on foundational ideas in Natural Language Processing. This let me explore more of the historical people, ideas, and processes that shaped the field.
I was especially interested in tackling NLP because of its overlap with linguistics. This intersection creates a field where people attempt to solve complex language problems through computer science, which I think is interesting.
Grid
Grid construction was fairly straightforward, but I had to watch out for Lemmatization and Tokenization since they are both long and dominate the grid. There was a lot of back-and-forth on whether to include them because of their length, but they are important enough to the theme that I wanted to keep them regardless.
Clues
I questioned whether to include Turing and Shannon since their contributions to NLP were more conceptual than direct technical advances. However, their work influenced many of the foundational ideas in the field, so I ultimately decided to include them.
I included Chomsky because his work in linguistics fundamentally changed how people understood and formalized language through rule-based systems. That framework heavily influenced early NLP and computational linguistics.
I spent a lot of time editing clues to make them clearer and easier to understand. This was difficult because terms like Parse Tree, Markov, and N-gram are intrinsically technical, so it can be hard to explain them in simple language without losing nuance. The same applies to terms like Phoneme, Semantics, Stemming, and Lemmatization, where much of the context comes from linguistics.
After publishing the puzzle, I made revisions the next day. Re-reading the clues after some distance made me realize that parts of the clue set were harder to understand than I originally thought.
Tradeoffs
I realize that puzzles covering more specialized themes like Natural Language Processing may feel inaccessible to people without much experience in these topics. I try to structure clues so that even if someone does not know the answer, they still learn something new or interesting about the theme being covered.
My puzzles are designed with partial completion in mind, and I hope people solving them do not feel discouraged if they are unable to answer every question since the intent of the puzzles is a brief exploration of the theme.
I personally would not have been able to answer many of these questions before writing them.
Notes
I thought Chomsky was a particularly fun clue to include since I don’t usually include people from adjacent fields. However, his influence on linguistics was so foundational to NLP that I felt he had to be included.
It also highlights how applications of computer science to real-world problems are often interdisciplinary and do not exist in isolation.